A version of this essay will be printed in the
forthcoming book, “Don’t Believe the Hype! Ferguson, Black Lives Matter and Hip
Hop”, being released by U.NET, a radical Italian publishing collective.
The line of New Afrikan resistance to enslavement, colonial subjugation,
capitalist exploitation and white supremacy has never been broken since our
mass introduction to the Great Turtle Island (i.e. the North American continent)
in 1619 (and before, going back to 1526 and the Afrikan revolt against the Spanish settler-colony of San Miguel de Gualdape). Because of the ideological onslaught of the myth of a “post-racial”
society advanced by the liberal faction of the US ruling class since the
1990’s, and the ebb of the Black Liberation Movement in the early portion of
the 2000’s, many political scientists and commentators were declaring that the
Black Liberation Movement was dead, or worse that it was no longer necessary or
relevant. The resurgence of mass, militant resistance over the last 2 years has
laid many of these reactionary notions to rest. However, what is not as clearly
understood or recognized about this resurgence is how it has been building and
maturing over the past 10 years.
The Black Liberation Movement, like all critical social
movements, should be looked at as a wave of energy. It ebbs and flows and until
the gravity of the contradictions New Afrikan people confront with capitalism,
imperialism, and white supremacy are eliminated, either through
self-emancipation or genocidal defeat, it will always do so. Over the last 10
years the flow of energy that is the Black Liberation Movement has steadily increased.
The catalyst for the most recent amassing and mobilization of this energy was
the government made catastrophe in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast in the wake of
Hurricane Katrina. This man-made catastrophe exposed that reactionary force’s within society and the government were
politically willing and able to dispose of Black people in mass, particularly
those sectors of the Black working class that have largely become superfluous
to the process of capital accumulation.
This
catastrophe stimulated the collective consciousness of Black people, reminiscent
to how the images of the grossly distorted body of Emmitt Till catalyzed Black consciousness
over 60 years ago inspiring the mass resistance of the 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s.
The images of dead Black bodies floating in flood waters, thousands of Black
people crying for aid at the Superdome, and the military occupation of New Orleans
conjured up the nightmares of slavery, Klan raids, lynching’s and thousands of
other horrors experienced by New Afrikan people. These images and events reawakened
the Black radical imagination, which compelled millions of Black people to question
the society more critically and, gradually, to act in defiant resistance.
The
resistance was first registered as public outrage expressed through various
forms of Black and “mainstream”, white dominated media. But it swiftly turned
to direct action. The first steps were taken in direct response to the human
rights violations committed by the US government in New Orleans via protests,
demonstrations, and a regional people’s assembly that was hosted in Jackson,
Mississippi in December 2005, organized by the Mississippi Disaster Relief
Coalition and the People’s Hurricane Relief Fund. However, the pattern of Black mass resistance that
we are witnessing now began to concretely emerge in 2006 – 2007 with the campaign
to defend the Jena 6.
The
Jena 6 were six teenage Black males convicted in 2006 of beating a white student
in Jena, Louisiana who participated in a mock lynch action threatening the
lives of the 6 young Black men and the Black people in that small community. A
national campaign centered on overturning their convictions emerged in late
2006 and early 2007, which culminated with a mass mobilization of over 20,000
Black people who descended upon the city of Jena and effectively shut it down on
September 20th, 2007. Although this campaign had many weaknesses - such
as its lack of broader transformative demands, the blatant disregard for local
leadership exhibited at times, the woefully inadequate political education of
the defendants and their families, and the lack of national follow through, to
name but a few – it did set a tone and fashioned a precedent.
The
motion that was initiated by actions in Mississippi and Louisiana in 2005 and
2007 respectively, were carried forward and advanced in Oakland, California in
2009 in response to the extrajudicial killing of Oscar Grant on January 1st,
2009. The Justice for Oscar Grant Campaign assimilated several critical lessons
on how to overcome the shortcomings of the campaigns in New Orleans and Jena
and established some critical new models and precedents. The Justice for Oscar
Grant Campaign engaged national social movement forces, but was initiated and
led by local working class forces, which fostered its staying power as it
maintained critical momentum for nearly 2 years locally and statewide
(particularly in Los Angeles). The Oscar Grant Campaign also was able to craft
and articulate a set of transitional demands that addressed both local
structural dynamics, as well as national structural dynamics. However, the
movement was unable to successfully address many political and ideological
differences, which lead to disruptive infighting and fragmentation. However,
like Jena before it, the Oscar Grant Campaign set a national precedent that was
picked up and adapted in later struggles.
The Justice
for Trayvon Martin campaign, which developed after Trayvon was extra judicially
killed in Sanford, Florida on February 2012, was a critical crest in the present
upsurge of the Black Liberation Movement. The Justice for Trayvon Martin
campaign assimilated many of the organizing lessons from Oakland, Jena and New
Orleans, but also incorporated many lessons drawn from the Occupy Movement that
emerged in New York City in September 2011. These lessons were assimilated by
local and national organizers alike who launched the campaign. But, the most
critical development that emerged from this campaign was the development of
numerous new youth organizations and alliances, like the Million Hoodies
Movement and the Dream Defenders. None of the previous rebellious episodes and
campaigns produced new formations with broader systemic agendas. Prior to this
campaign there were local defense committee’s and foundations that were started
in the names of the victims, like the Oscar Grant Foundation, but not new
political formations. The new formations that emerged as a result of this campaign
and how they connected to older radical formations, like the Malcolm X
Grassroots Movement, the People’s Organization for Progress, the Organization
for Black Struggle, Anarchist People of Color, the Black Autonomy Federation, Freedom
Road Socialist Organization, the African People’s Socialist Party, the Black is
Back Coalition and the Black Left Unity Network proved critical for the
deepening and broadening of the movement since 2012.
Another
critical development from the 2012 – 2013 period was the development of a
number of critical analytical and agitation tools produced by some of the older
radical Black Radical formations, who correctly surmised that the tide of
resistance was advancing but needed some political focus and ideological
grounding. To this end, the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement issued a number of
reports starting in 2012 that analyzed the escalating rate of extrajudicial
killings of Black people. This culminated with the production of “Operation
Ghetto Storm” (see http://www.operationghettostorm.org/),
better known as the Every 28 Hours Report. This report established a solid
political reasoning and analytical foundation for the reawakening that we are
experiencing now. It exposed the extent to which Black people are being
disposed of by the state and started the dialogue regarding what can and must
we do about it. This work was supplemented by periodic analysis pieces, and
organizing guides such as “Let Your Motto Be Resistance” (see https://mxgm.org/let-your-motto-be-resistance-a-handbook-on-organizing-new-afrikan-and-oppressed-communities-for-self-defense/) and “We Charge Genocide
Again” (see https://mxgm.org/we-charge-genocide-again-new-curriculum-on-every-28-hours-report/).
These
works were supplemented by more strategic works, like the “Jackson-Kush Plan”
(see http://navigatingthestorm.blogspot.com/2012/05/the-jackson-kush-plan-and-struggle-for.html),
which was publicly released in the summer of 2012, to try and ground a younger
generation confronting the cold realities of disposability in the development
and execution of revolutionary theory and practice. What many of these works have been
struggling to convey is that we need to build a mass movement that focuses
equally on organizing and building autonomous, self-organized and executed
social projects and campaigns and initiatives that apply transformative
pressure on the government and the forces of economic exploitation and
domination (see “Until We Win” for more details http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/04/until-we-win-black-labor-and-liberation-in-the-disposable-era/).
When
the world learned of Mike Brown’s murder via a state sanctioned extrajudicial
killing on August 9th, 2014, they did so as a direct result of the
mobilization of the infrastructure built by the movement over the preceding 9
years, particularly connections and relationships that were built in 2012. The
Black August rebellion in Ferguson, Missouri had a spontaneous dimension to it,
but it persisted and grew as a direct result of the movement’s national
coordination and infrastructure. It was this national coordination which developed
and employed a common nomenclature via social media that was able to transform
public perception of the movement and the conditions of Black people via the
mass utilization of the #Every28Hours and #BlackLivesMatter hash tags. It was
also as a direct result of this infrastructure that Black Lives Matter was able
to quickly transform from a hash tag, to a slogan, to an international
organization and network.
The
Movement for Black Lives, which is rapidly becoming the most common name
employed to describe the current upsurge of the Black Liberation Movement, is a
phenomenon still very much in development. It’s most distinguishing features
and contributions to date have been an elevation and highlighting of women’s
and queer struggles within the Black community, the employment of an intersectional
analysis and politics, and the development of and struggle for non-hierarchical
organizations. In this regard is it simultaneously an internal challenge to the
community itself as well as an external challenge to the society at large, both
of which are needed. There are numerous ideological and political tendencies
within the movement contending for preeminence in determining the course of its
program and direction. Where these battles are most acute are over demand
development.
The
main point of concern for Black revolutionaries (i.e. revolutionary
nationalists, communists, and anarchists) operating in the movement is how to
transform the current rebellious motion into a revolutionary movement.
Revolutionaries must do everything we can to confront and defeat the extreme
cooptive pressure being exerted by the Democratic Party and liberal
philanthropic capital to narrow the movements focus towards policy reforms that
will only enable minor tweaks to the current neo-liberal strategy of capitalist
accumulation and the policies and programs of Black disposal governing the
settler-colonial state apparatus.
However,
moving the movement in a revolutionary direction is going to be a struggle. The
overall weakness of anti-capitalist, anti-colonial, and anti-imperialist
movements in the United States and the world means that the broad Black working
class base the movement is drawing from has little experience with these
radical ideologies and social systems. But, this is a new moment where our
people are learning more in a few days then they typically do in decades. So,
this is no time for pessimism, it is a time for revolutionary optimism and the
dogged determination of our will to overcome the tremendous odds confronting
us.
New
Afrikan people refuse to go quietly into the night. The resistance of the last
10 years clearly demonstrates that the Black Liberation Movement is far from
dead. New Afrikan people remain a central contradiction within the US
settler-colonial project, one that will ultimately be resolved through a
revolutionary program of decolonization or genocide. What the present
illustrates clearly is that from 1619 to now, our resistance remains unbroken,
unbowed, and undeterred and will remain so until we are free.
3 comments:
Bro. Kali,
It's hard getting past the first sentence of your essay, which extends the Anglo-American narrative of New Afrikan resistance starting in 1619.
Your readers need to know that New Afrikan resistance to European settler-colonialism goes much farther back in history.
As early as 1526, enslaved Africans liberated themselves from the Spanish at San Miguel de Gualdape by setting fire to colony's buildings and running away to the surrounding area.
From 1565 onward, at Saint Augustine (FL), enslaved Africans again ran away from Spanish domination. These self-liberated Africans melded with indigenous "Indians" to create the fearless Seminole nation.
Also, long before 1619, enslaved Africans were liberating themselves from "New Spain" missions on the West Coast of North America.
These are only examples of New Afrikan resistance to Spanish rule. Similar instances are recorded among the early French explorers, too.
The point here, of course, is that New Afrikan history and our New Afrikan roots in North America don't begin with the British.
Excellent points comrade. Correction made.
I just want to say thank you. Excellent analysis especially around the reformist pull of the Democratic Party and bourgeois philanthropy. Hope to spread this far and wide and spark some stimulating discussion and action around this.
Post a Comment